News

Thursday, October 30, 2008

The New Yorker Cartoon Caption Contest Editor Bob Mankoff on Charlie Rose

Robert Mankoff, Cartoon Editor at The New Yorker was interviewed about The New Yorker Cartoon Caption Contest Book on Charlie Rose.

http://www.charlierose.com/shows/2008/10/28/2/a-conversation-with-robert-mankoff#comment_67471

The New Yorker presents the best of the cartoon caption contest. Write your own captions for the top 100 cartoon contests, then see the best, and all the rest.

Since its inception in 1925, the New Yorker has been world famous for its cartoons. Not surprisingly, the cartoon caption contest has quickly become one of the magazine's most popular features. Located on the back page, the contest invites readers to craft their own captions for the weekly cartoon. Thousands enter each week, but only one wins.

This entertaining collection, the first of six books in an exclusive series with Andrews McMeel Publishing, presents the top 100 caption contests, with the winners, the runners-up, and everyone in between (available on-line), plus fun facts and stats about who is entering and why. Learn how the finalists came up with their captions, and how their lives changed after winning. Discover the inner workings of the caption contest and then see if you have what it takes to be a successful cartoon caption writer.

Cindy Mushet Interview on Seattle Tall Poppy

An Interview with Cindy Mushet on the "Art & Soul of Baking"

Cindy Mushet's definitive book, the Art & Soul of Baking.

If you don't know the name Cindy Mushet, let me introduce you. She's one of those people in the background who makes amazing things happen. Her contributions may not always have her name blazed on them, but her impact is evidenced by a rich history in the culinary world. Cindy was a contributor to the Joy of Cooking, has taught throughout the United States for Sur La Table and is currently an instructor at Le Cordon Bleu. Her recipes have appeared in Bon Appétit, Fine Cooking, the New York Times, and the National Culinary Review.

Cindy's currently on a whistle-stop book tour...and coming to a Sur La Table near you!

During her 24 hour stay in Seattle, I had the opportunity to meet with Cindy and it was kismet from the beginning. We chatted over lunch and then strolled over to my favorite bakery for a little nosh. She was just days into her 3 week tour, and despite having already done an early morning TV spot, a pod cast interview and a newspaper interview, by the time we talked she was still a fireball of energy.

A long history of teaching permeates Cindy's culinary style. She understands how her students feel, going through the effort to bake something, only to fail with a dessert you can't serve. "That's when people go to Costco and pick up something cheap." But there are so many things wrong with cheap: desserts are packed with preservatives to extend the shelf life and the ingredients stray far from anything that might be good for you...or flavorful.

Her mission became: Teach a Man to Bake, Don't Give Him a Cake.

Warm and engaging, Cindy's got an analytical mind that probes with a laser focus until she lands on the answer. While there are some excellent baking books, many of them lack direction in the most basic steps. One of the most frustrating steps both she and her students struggled with was the familiar: cream butter until light & fluffy. "What does that mean?" In her frustration she surmised, "Butter never looks fluffy...or light." Eventually she learned "light" meant light in color, not texture. And "fluffy" spoke to the incorporation of air into the butter. It's that attention to the intention that makes her recipes a step above.

To perfect her baking, she applied a scientific approach -- baking cakes repeatedly, changing the ratios at each attempt. Then, she'd study the results and determine what yielded the best outcome.

This scientific approach came from an early influence by the San Francisco's Baker's Dozen group. At the time, she was living in Berkley and there were a number of bakers in the area. They'd gather and talk about issues they were having, "I'm having a problem with this dough...do you know anything about that?"

Eventually, the group gelled into something more formal. They'd meet once a quarter and learn from each other. Tackling Angel Food cake, for instance, each person brought a finished cake and the recipe. "You wouldn't believe the variety! They all fell under the category of Angle Food cakes, but they were so different." Getting to the heart of the differences, the group sampled each cake, decided which characteristics were ideal, and then compared recipes. Side by side, they'd see the ingredients were the same. "Okay, now what did you do differently?" They'd analyze the techniques that arrived at an excellent finished product. Not surprising, this process deeply influenced Cindy's approach to baking.

When she was first asked to write a book on baking, Cindy thought, "What could I say about baking that hasn't already been said?" After further reflection...and before she'd given a final answer, she tapped into her own collection of over 200 baking books. Laying multiple books out on the living room floor, she poured over them with an analytic approach ---what's here? What's missing? And most importantly, what did her Sur La Table students struggle with when using the recipes?

Because she had years of contact with students who are often unsure, she could see firsthand where the issues where, and modified her own recipes accordingly.

Then Cindy turned to the bible of cooking science, Harold McGee's On Food and Cooking: The Science and Lore of the Kitchen. While the book is a treasure trove of information, admittedly, it's a very dry read.

So, Cindy asked herself, "How can I combine both solid recipes and provide enough information to help people understand the science behind what's going on?"

She was determined to prove success in baking is built on a solid foundation...not a fluke. Tapping into an analytical approach, combined with years of teaching, the result is her latest book, the Art and Soul of Baking.

It hits the mark on every level.

In fact, she gives a lot of credit to Sur La Table, who was the impetus behind the project. They were very "hands off" in the creation of this book. None of the directions were cropped or modified to save space. And they gave her the time necessary to create a book of substance. Two years to write it, one year for editing means this book is much more than just a collection of recipes.

Baker's Dozen alum, Alice Medrich, wrote the forward and she highlights two key points: the chart for Baking Pan Volumes (What's the difference between a 9 x 1" Pyrex pie pan and a 9 x 1 1/2" Emily Henry fluted pie pan? It's here.) And a handy chart that converts measuring cups and spoons into exact weights. Alice notes, "The book's two essential double-page charts should be photocopied and hung inside a cupboard door for easy reference." Taking a cue from Alice, mine are laminated and stuck to the side of the refrigerator...and I refer to them, regularly.

The Art & Soul of Baking is packed with relevant information designed to bring success into the kitchen. Whether you're a novice or a seasoned baker, I found her discussion on the Eight Main Ingredients invaluable. And the photos for bread dough detailing the different stages: underrisen, perfectly risen, and overrisen doughs provides the visual cues necessary when conquering the land of yeast. Tips in the margins, "What the Pros Know" layers the knowledge base, providing multiple "ah-ha!" moments.

I consider myself a fairly accomplished baker and I've got dozens of books on the subject. Frankly, this is the book I have been looking for. Cindy is a perfect guide -- explaining not just how, but why. Surely I'd be a better baker today if I'd had this book sooner.

The good news is, there's still plenty for me to learn. And with Cindy as my guide, next up...conquering my fear of yeast!

***

Now, if you're a serious baker, no trip to Seattle would be complete without a stop at Bakery Nouveau. The owner, William Lehman, has a stable full of accolades, but most notably, he was the Captain of the Bread Bakers Guild, Team USA in 2005. Teams from around the world competed at the prestigious event and William's team took home the gold. (You can still catch footage of the competition on Food Network re-runs.)

After lunch, Cindy and I made a beeline to Bakery Nouveau.

This is what Cindy called "research":



One of my favorite things about dining with chefs, is watching the way they eat. I'm fascinated by how they truly tune into what they're eating. Look, smell, touch come into play and mentally, each dish is deconstructed before the first bite. Cindy was impressed with the crumb on William's baguettes and took note of features in the crust.




This caramel and custard beauty is one of my favorites. Cindy's book tour escort joined us and just before we tackled this dish, Cindy took a moment to explain how the caramel coating was brought to a dark amber, creating an intense caramel flavor that is actually balanced by bitter notes from the depth of the caramelization process.

As you can see, this is a visually stunning dessert and I love the gold leaf detail. This dessert is called the Phoenix. It's three layers of mousse (chocolate, pear and caramel) on a bed of candied pecans, bathed in a caramel glaze.





Pause for a swoon. This is my absolute favorite dessert at Bakery Nouveau: a crispy thin praline base with a uber creamy chocolate-hazelnut mousse, topped with milk chocolate shavings. Prailine Dream, indeed.



Finally, I just have to share this photo. When we first sat down, this was Cindy's initial reaction!

http://seattletallpoppy.blogspot.com/2008/10/interview-with-cindy-mushet-on-art-soul.html

Wednesday, October 29, 2008

Dilbert 2.0 on Entrepreneur

Dilbert Turns 20 (Almost)

By: Mike Werling | October 28, 2008 1:44 PM

Happy Birthday, Dilbert. Put 20 candles on the cake and sing a refrain of the world's most sung song to the character who feels the angst of every cubicle-bound employee and represents the dashed hopes of so many dreamers. (How he would blow out the candles is beyond me. Dude's got no mouth.)

The ubiquitous workplace presence, creation of multiple-low-paying-job-holder and current entrepreneur Scott Adams, has said and done many of the things workers around the world only wish they could say and do. And for most of that time he's been trapped in the same cubicle.

To mark the occasion of Dilbert's 20th--he doesn't look a day over however old he was when the strip began--United Features Syndicate Inc. and Andrews McMeel Publishing have created a hefty collection of Adams' ode to workers everywhere--though oddly enough Dilbert didn't start out as a workplace comic.

At 576 pages, "Dilbert 2.0: 20 Years of Dilbert" doesn't include every Dilbert comic, but what it lacks in completeness it more than makes up for in weight. The DVD included with the book, however, does contain every comic from Dilbert's April 16, 1989, debut through April 2008.

Adams makes the book a compelling read by sprinkling his comments throughout. He points out the first appearance of this or that character; he riffs on his lack of drawing prowess; he highlights a joke that fell flat; he explains how using a sentence from a memo at his real job in one of his early strips earned him worse and worse assignments at work--and how his comic strips got funnier as a result.

One of my favorites, about a March 30, 2006, strip: "This was the first successful use of the word "crap" in a Dilbert comic. It was a long, hard struggle, and perhaps not the worthiest goal, but success feels good no matter where you find it."

Adams himself has moved from worker drone to the role of entrepreneur. He owns two restaurants, one of which he actively manages. I wonder if he has become the pointy-haired boss in any of his employees' eyes.

After 20 years, one might think he'd be out of ideas for the strip, but as long as there are meetings, coworkers, consultants (and consulting fees), bosses, technology, accounting departments, office policies, new guys and human resources, Adams will have material.

http://blog.entrepreneur.com/2008/10/post.php

Scott Adams Interview on The New Yorker


October 29, 2008

An Interview with the “Dilbert” Cartoonist Scott Adams

Scott Adams is the genius behind the comic strip “Dilbert,” and behind every genius is a stalker, lurking in a crawl space. I like to think that each of our readers is like that stalker: hungry, semi-naked, and scratching at an itch that doesn’t exist. I’m almost choked up now.

And now, the man, the legend, Scott Adams:

Cartoon Lounge: Scott, thanks for taking the time to do this interview. I’ve already buried your fee of fifty gold doubloons in your back yard, as per your instructions. You have a very beautiful garden.

Scott Adams: (Nods, lips sealed tightly.)

C.L.: How does it make you feel that “Office Space,” “The Office,” the American version of “The Office,” the German version of “The Office,” and the animated television show “Dilbert” all stole your idea?

S.A.: I would feel bad if I hadn’t stolen the idea of a loser with a talking dog from Charles Schulz. My contribution to the creative process was realizing Dilbert would starve if he didn’t have a job.

C.L.: When you first started drawing “Dilbert,” were people in your office mad? Was your boss like, “Wait a second…I have pointy hair…”?

S.A.: I had several different bosses during the early years of “Dilbert.” They were all pretty sure I was mocking someone else.

C.L.: Do you own a dogbert?

S.A.: I recently got a toy Australian Shepherd. I’m teaching her to walk on two legs (really) because I think it’s funny. Not all the time, but at least when company comes over. If I can get her to wear glasses, that’s pure comedy gold.

C.L.: A rat?

S.A.: I’m sure there is a rat around here someplace.

C.L.: Dinosaur?

S.A.: Hard to say. They are notoriously good at hiding.

C.L.: How did you first get published, and when did you become syndicated?

S.A.: For the full story, see my new twentieth anniversary book, “Dilbert 2.0.” (Smooth, eh?) The short version is that I bought a book on how to become a cartoonist and followed the directions on submitting work to the big comic-syndication outfits. I was rejected by all of them but United Media. Before that, my only attempt at commercial cartooning had been some submissions to magazines such as The New Yorker and Playboy, all rejected. (Actually, the comics rejected by the The New Yorker and Playboy are in “Dilbert 2.0.”)

C.L.: Do you generally come up with a bunch of strips for the week in one sitting, or spread it out over the week?

S.A.: For most of my career I did one comic a day, every day, including weekends and holidays. After I got married a few years ago, I have been doing two dailies per day on Mondays, Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Fridays, and one Sunday comic on Wednesdays. That gets me ahead for vacations, and leaves weekends mostly open.

C.L.: How far in advance do you have to have a strip in?

S.A.: I think it’s about five weeks for daily comics and nine weeks for Sundays.

C.L.: You lost the ability to draw. How did this happen, what was it like for you, and how did you overcome it?

S.A.: It was tough. I burned out my drawing hand by using it too much. The common word for it is writer’s cramp. The fancy words for it are focal dystonia. The symptom in my case was a pinky finger that went spastic when I tried to draw.

I first got symptoms over ten years ago, and drew some strips left-handed while working through it. Over time, I retrained the hand by a gradual process of getting closer and closer to the motion of drawing without actually drawing, until my brain somehow allowed it. (The problem is in the brain. That can be proven by the fact that my right hand would spasm when I drew with my left hand.) Anyway, I was probably the first person who ever overcame that particular problem.

About ten years later, I overused the hand again, and the problem returned. This time I ditched paper and pen and started using the Wacom Cintiq 21 ux, which allows me to draw directly to the computer screen. Although the motion is the same as drawing on paper, my brain doesn’t recognize it as such, and I have no problems whatsoever. Now the dystonia has gone away again, but would pop up if I started overusing the hand and drawing on paper again. But that won’t happen. The computer cuts my production time in half. I love it.

C.L.: You lost the ability to speak. How did this happen, what was it like for you, and how did you overcome it?

S.A.: These dystonia problems often travel in pairs. After a bout of a routine respiratory virus, plus allergies, I got a normal case of laryngitis that never went away. It morphed (again from overuse and straining the voice muscles) into something called spasmodic dysphonia. The vocal cords would clench shut when I tried to speak, making it difficult for anyone to understand a word I said. I was essentially unable to speak for over three years. The condition is incurable, or so the literature says.

This summer, I had surgery at U.C.L.A. to rewire the nerves in my neck and cure this incurable condition. My surgeon, Dr. Berke, pioneered this technique. Apparently it worked, because for the past two weeks I have been able to speak. (It takes several months for the nerves to regenerate.) I can’t shout yet, but the prognosis is good. In casual conversation my voice sounds about normal, and will keep improving.

C.L.: Incredible. I have had a turtle for four long, dark years, and I have not been able to teach him word one.

S.A.: I think I bought some wax from him.

C.L.: I read…somewhere…that you once put on a fake wig and mustache and pretended to be a management consultant for Logitech. First of all, that is awesome. Second, is it true? Third, was this just for the sake of art (i.e. tax deductible)?

S.A.: It is true. I did it for fun, and for publicity for a book.

C.L.: Now that you work from home, do you have to take vacations where you spend a month in an office so you can get material for “Dilbert”?

S.A.: I have an endless stream of suggestions coming in from readers who are in cubicles. That keeps me going.

C.L.: Who were your favorite cartoonists/comics growing up?

S.A.: Charles Schulz, all the cartoonists for Mad, and Al Capp.

C.L.: Who are your favorites now?

S.A.: “Pearls Before Swine,” “Basic Instructions,” “F Minus,” and anything by Roz Chast.

C.L.: What makes you angry?

S.A.: I get angry in retail stores that have vague rules about where the line forms.

C.L.: As the owner of a small sandwich shop in New York City, I am always interested to find out about the operations of other cartoonists who run food empires. How did you decide to start Scott Adams Food, Inc., and when can we expect to see the Dilberito in stores again?

S.A.: I started a food company after realizing it was impossible to get all the vitamins and minerals you need from a well-balanced diet. Do the math yourself. You can eat veggies all day long and never get close to the recommended minimums. So I thought I could make the world a better place by selling a fortified food that was inexpensive and tasty and convenient. As it turns out, the world wasn’t interested in being healthy, so I got out of that business eventually.

C.L.: Back to the new book, “Dilbert 2.0.”—What is included?

S.A.: It’s a big, beautiful, ten-pound coffee-table book with a few thousand of my favorite comics, including the ones too naughty to get published in newspapers. It also has stories about the trouble I got into for strips that did get published. I tell the story of how I went from cubicle to cartooning, which required lots of luck and the kindness of strangers. We also include a disc that has every “Dilbert” comic published in newspapers from 1989 until we went to production.

C.L.: There is a huge economic crisis in the world, people are losing their homes, their jobs, their retirements. Can you show us what would happen if Dilbert became a werewolf who was always dancing?

S.A.: Finally, a question no one has ever asked!

DancingDilbertwerewolf.jpg

C.L.: We are doing nonstop election coverage this month. Any thoughts on whether there will be an election?

S.A.: There will be an election, followed by rioting, the complete unraveling of society, and, I assume, a zombie problem. And everyone will agree it’s an improvement.

C.L.: Thanks again, Scott.

http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/cartoonlounge/2008/10/scott-adams-dilbert.html

Tuesday, October 28, 2008

Scott Adams Interview on Motley Fool

9 Things You Should Do Instead of Buying Stocks

Most know Scott Adams only as the creator of Dilbert. But after a recent meeting with him at his Silicon Valley office, we think we know him a lot better than that.

We watched him draw Dilbert on a touch-sensitive PC that we're still salivating over. We got a closer look at one of the two local eateries that he owns. We heard first-hand about his new book, Dilbert 2.0. It was an engaging and entertaining conversation -- right up to the moment one of us mentioned stocks.

Whoops.

Here's what really caught our attention
Adams' passion for personal finance is matched only by his utter disdain for stocks. That's right, this keen observer of business and management trends believes that most people, himself included, cannot beat the market buying individual stocks -- especially when the companies behind those stocks are run by drunk chimpanzees.

Read more: http://www.fool.com/investing/high-growth/2008/10/23/9-things-you-should-do-instead-of-buying-stocks.aspx

Rachel Hale/Baby Love on Good Morning America

Watch the piece that was shown on Good Morning America featuring award-winning photographer Rachael Hale and her stunning new book Baby Love:

http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/Books/story?id=6090990


About Baby Love:

Offering over 100 brilliant four-color portraits accompanied by poetic verses, historic data, and surprising facts, readers can learn where birthdays began and how they are celebrated in different countries. Baby Love: An Affectionate Miscellany also includes an indispensable baby names list for fickle moms and dads-to-be. This beautiful book makes the perfect gift for anyone expecting an addition to their family.

Monday, October 27, 2008

Cul de Sac Reviewed by A.V. Club

Reclusive cartoonist Bill Watterson wrote the foreword for the first collection of Richard Thompson's Cul De Sac (Andrews McMeel), and that's apt, because Thompson's strip is the best thing to happen to the daily comics page since Watterson retired Calvin & Hobbes. After spending a couple of years developing Cul De Sac as a weekly in The Washington Post, Thompson launched the strip as a syndicated daily last September. The comic follows the adventures of the suburban Otterloop family, and in particular Alice, a perpetually wired preschooler who spends her days bossing around her classmates, her afternoons trying to comprehend her finicky older brother Petey, and her evenings befuddling her well-meaning parents. Though sassy-kid strips aren't exactly a rarity, Thompson has a knack for heightening the mundane details of post-toddler suburban life—chirpy teachers, eccentric children's-book authors, enormous fast-food-restaurant play structures, and so on—until they rise to the level of absurdity. The first Cul De Sac book contains the original weeklies and the first few months of dailies, though the strip doesn't really find its rhythm until the dailies start. It doesn't take long for Thompson to figure out how to work in gags about the pile of snow (known as "Old Mount Soot") that rises in the grocery-store parking lot every year, and how in school, "neatness plus creativity equals art." Once Thompson gets into a groove, he produces one of the few strips around where nearly every individual panel is standalone delight… A-

http://www.avclub.com/content/node/89005

Wednesday, October 22, 2008

Rachael Hale, Baby Love Television Appearances

Good Morning America and Access Hollywood
will be airing their Rachael Hale segments on their shows on October 23rd.

Good Morning America will air the piece in their 7:00 am hour (Central Time), probably between 7:30-8:00 am.

Focusing on ‘real' images that any mother, father, or grandparent can appreciate, Hale manages to photograph more than just expression. Whether splashing in a bubble bath or napping atop a fuzzy teddy bear, Hale captures the inner soul of each little one.

Offering over 100 brilliant four-color portraits accompanied by poetic verses, historic data, and surprising facts, readers can learn where birthdays began and how they are celebrated in different countries. Baby Love: An Affectionate Miscellany also includes an indispensable baby names list for fickle moms and dads-to-be. This beautiful book makes the perfect gift for anyone expecting an addition to their family.

Baby Love Featured in People Magazine

Baby Love by Rachael Hale is featured in the November 3, 2008 issue of People Magazine.

It has been said that sometimes the smallest things take up the most room in your heart. Nothing tugs at our heartstrings more than the wide (and often toothless) smile of a baby. Award-winning photographer Rachael Hale focuses her lens on her newest subjects creating a sweet and adorable collection entitled, Baby Love: An Affectionate Miscellany

Tuesday, October 21, 2008

Mattie J.T. Stepanek Park Dedicated; Oprah Winfrey Attends

On Saturday, October 18, the mayor of Rockville, MD dedicated Mattie J.T. Stepanek Park, where kids and adults can play and listen to tapes of Mattie’s messages.

Oprah Winfrey surprised Jeni Stepanik at the park’s dedication.

It was featured on Good Morning America:
http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/Story?id=6069915&page=2

Mattie J.T. Stepanek books from Andrews McMeel Publishing, LLC:
Just Peace: A Message of Hope
Reflections of a Peacemaker: A Portrait in Poetry

Thursday, October 16, 2008

The Art and Soul of Baking Review by Baking Bites

The Art and Soul of Baking

The Art and Soul of Baking is a new book from Sur La Table’s relatively young cookbook line. Things Cooks Love was published earlier this year and another book, Knives Cooks Love, is due out at the end of this month. The store is known for its top quality kitchenware, so it’s no surprise to see them putting it to good use in a book like this one.

The Art and Soul of Baking a huge compendium of all things baked. The book has nearly 300 recipes in its 464 pages, as well as tons of information about kitchen equipment and ingredients. The introduction to the book is broken up into two parts and is the main reference section. The Baker’s Kitchen chapter is primarily dedicated to describing the use and purpose of various pieces of baking-related kitchen equipment, and also gives weight and volume conversion tables. The Baker’s Pantry chapter is dedicated to ingredients, describing how things are made, what the flavors are like and how to use them.

The recipes are broken down into chapters by type, and are all well-written. At the beginning of each chapter there is a little primer on how to be as successful as possible with your cakes, breads, souffles, etc. The instructions are descriptive and there are plenty of tips given in the sidebars to help make the process as easy as possible. The book also makes note of possible variations on each recipe. There are plenty of full-page photographs in the book, and while they are excellent shots, not every recipe is covered. Overall, it’s a nice book that will give the reader plenty of recipe options and some great reference material, the sheer size of the book is a little intimidating, even though the clear writing and friendly tone will keep a reader engaged once he or she starts to flip through the pages. The book’s author, Cindy Mushet, has a blog set up that is a great way to get a preview of the book.

Wednesday, October 15, 2008

Rachael Hale to be on Good Morning America

Good Morning America is to air a piece with featuring Rachael Hale and Baby Love.

Rachael Hale's luminous four-color photography captures the essence of babies napping, laughing, and mugging for the camera. Whether the babies are splashing happily in the bath, dozing on the sofa, or gazing at the camera with wide-eyed rapture, Hale's images focus on the infants themselves, and her lens captures the inner soul, humanity, and character of each little one.

Baby Love combines more than 100 expressive baby portraits with a mixture of poetry and verse, along with surprising facts and historical details that celebrate all things baby. Readers will learn where birthdays originated and how different countries around the globe celebrate the annual milestone, as well as additional baby-inspired facts and trivia. Also included are lists of the top boy and girl names to help inspire moms- and dads-to-be.

Hale has been designated as a Master of Photography at the New Zealand Institute of Professional Photography Awards and received her fellowship—the highest accolade a New Zealand photographer can achieve—in 2000.

Tuesday, October 7, 2008

Organic Marin Review on The Food Paper

Organic Marin

Recipes From Land to Table
by Tim Porter and Farina Wong Kingsley

Just north of San Francisco, across the Golden Gate Bridge, sits an Eden of organic farming known as Marin County. With organic roots reaching back more than 30 years that are grounded in the post-sixties values of clean living, community, and collective effort, Marin is considered the birthplace of the organic farming movement. Its close proximity to food-oriented San Francisco and preponderance of eco-literate residents have made Marin a modern utopia of local consumption and environmental sustainability, as well as a model for the nation. Organic Marin illustrates the journey of local crops and pasture-raised animals from the soil to the tables of the Bay Area's finest organic restaurants. In the process, it profiles sixteen of the region's most esteemed organic farms and features 50 recipes contributed by dining establishments which incorporate Marin's locally produced ingredients.

Appropriately, the recipes are organized by season and guided by nature's bounty. Spring brings recipes like MarketBar San Francisco's fava bean bruschetta, which incorporates Marin Star Route Farm's young, tender fava beans. Summer stone fruit stars in grilled pork tenderloin and nectarines with bacon vinaigrette, contributed by Picco in Larkspur. Hearty fall choices include butternut squash gratin from Greens Restaurant in San Francisco and orecchiette with sausage ragu and broccoli rabe from Piatti Ristorante and Bar in Mill Valley. Unique winter selections include Fork Restaurant in San Anselmo's carrot flan with peppercress and mustard vinaigrette, as well as braised short ribs with candied Meyer lemon gremolata from AVA restaurant in San Anselmo. Desserts range from the light spring panna cotta with fresh strawberries, contributed by San Francisco's Scott Howard, to the decadent winter double chocolate bread pudding, courtesy of Buckeye Roadhouse, Mill Valley. Though reading about these dishes may inspire you to hop a plane to the Bay Area for some food tourism, Organic Marin offers the promise of creating a slice of Eden in your own home kitchen.

http://www.thefoodpaper.com/cookbooks/organic_marin.html

Monday, October 6, 2008

Scott Adams: The Monday Interview with Publisher's Weekly

The Monday Interview: Dilbert Creator Scott Adams

By Dick Donahue -- Publishers Weekly, 10/6/2008 7:25:00 AM

An interview with Dilbert creator Scott Adams, whose Dilbert 2.0: 20 Years of Dilbert, will be published this month by Andrews McMeel.

PW: Where did Dilbert (and, for that matter, Dogbert) come from? Did he/they just walk across your sketch pad one day?? Was he modeled on a real person?

SA: Dilbert’s look is based on a real person, who doesn’t know it. I worked with him but didn’t know him well. He just had an in-teresting potato-shaped body that was fun to draw. He started as a doodle at my day job at a bank. Dilbert’s lack of social skills is modeled on my own personality; his professional skills are a composite of engineers I have known. And Dogbert is partly based on a family dog who never once came when I called, and partly on my own evil side.

PW: What was it that made you realize—and when—that Dilbert had become an American icon?

SA: It was popular long before it became an icon. I started realizing it was an icon when “Dilbert” entered the language as slang for a cubicle worker, and “pointy-haired boss” became shorthand for bad management.

PW: How in general has Dilbert kept up with the changing times?

SA: Dilbert became popular during the downsizing of the ’90s, and job security was a major theme of the strip. When the Dotcom era arrived, Dilbert and the gang started getting cocky, just like real engineers. Lately the themes are more about external forces (outsourcing, mergers) and how they impact the employees. I just write about what’s happening and hope people like it. It isn’t more complicated than that.

PW: What is it about Dilbert that’s kept him in the public eye for nearly 20 years??

SA: I think Dilbert will remain popular as long as employees are frustrated and they fear the consequences of complaining too loudly. Dilbert is the designated voice of discontent for the workplace. I never planned it that way. It just happened.

PW: What might Dilbert say about the current financial crisis?

SA: I have some comics in the pipeline about bailouts and mergers. My focus is on the impact on employees as opposed to philoso-phy. Sometimes that looks like philosophy to readers.

PW: This mammoth Dilbert 2.0 you’ve just labored over: how did you decide what to include and what to leave out?? (And were those choices as tough as I think they were?!)

SA: Editing was tough. But it helped that all the comics would be included on the disc with the book. I picked the comics that made me laugh when I reread them, having forgotten most of them by the time I put the book together. And I also included all the ones that got me in trouble or stirred controversy, as well as ones that were too edgy for publication. (Those are my best work.)

The New Yorker Cartoon Caption Contest in New York Times

Bob Mankoff, The New Yorker Cartoon Caption Contest, and The New Yorker Cartoon Caption Contest Book were featured in The New York Times

The Voice
The Editor of Laughs

Published: September 26, 2008

IF incongruity is the essence of humor, then Robert Mankoff, the cartoon editor of The New Yorker for the past 11 years, is a perfect study. At 64, with wavy silver hair and rectangular glasses, he has a professorial manner, but he is prone to go off on surprising tangents about everything from juggling (he keeps leather-covered balls in his office for when the mood strikes) to hair care products. “I need to go to mousse school,” he said one afternoon at his desk, trying to tamp down a few flyaway strands.

"Bantering and joking around and seeing things in a funny way, maybe a cynical way, even a skeptical way, is second nature for New Yorkers." — Robert Mankoff, cartoon editor of the New Yorker.

A self-proclaimed “undocumented” Ph.D. in psychology — he dropped out of a doctoral program at Queens College in the mid-’70s to become a cartoonist — Mr. Mankoff, who grew up in Flushing, Queens, is serious about humor. In 1991, he founded the Cartoon Bank, which eventually became a digital archive of New Yorker cartoons and cover art, and in 1999, along with David Remnick, his editor in chief, Mr. Mankoff inaugurated the magazine’s cartoon caption contest.

On Oct. 14, more than one million entries later, a hardcover volume titled “The New Yorker Cartoon Caption Contest Book: The Winners, the Losers and Everybody in Between” will be published. Mr. Mankoff will also discuss the contest at the annual New Yorker Festival.

The whimsical, cerebral Mr. Mankoff still draws, and one of his cartoons — in which a businessman yells into a telephone: “No, Thursday’s out. How about never — is never good for you?” — is among the most popular in the magazine’s history. On a recent day in his office, surrounded by stacks of the sketches that cartoonists fax in for consideration every week, he shared some tricks of the trade.

The first caption contest was a moment of necessity. We needed a back page for the Cartoon Issue. I remember seeing caption contests in Punch magazine in the ’60s and ’70s. I didn’t invent the idea of a caption contest, but I suggested it. The idea for the contest in its present form is David’s. I think he was inspired by the crossword puzzle in The Sunday Times; you always know it’s there, and it’s standard.

I think what makes someone good at writing captions is the ability to be very free in their thinking. Humor is essentially a type of play. If you try to solve this like you would answer an SAT question, you will fail. Part of it has to be loosey-goosey. When you look at one of these things, you have to let your mind be free, let your unconscious or subconscious do the processing. You can’t go through enough possibilities.

People like to say: “What’s the funniest caption? What’s the funniest joke?” It’s like saying, “What’s the best-tasting food?” It doesn’t actually make much sense. People’s taste in humor differs. Some people like wordplay and puns; I don’t, particularly, because it seems to me those are the only types of jokes that eventually will be able to be done by computer. Of course, a great pun is something else. Some people like humor that is aggressive. No one’s really suffering because it’s only a cartoon, but something bad is happening to somebody — and it’s not us. Then there are other people who like absurdity.

In one of the caption contests, there are parrots on all the people’s shoulders in a boardroom. So you start to associate. Parrots repeat things — people will talk about parroting. Also, parrots poop on you, so there will be a lot of dry-cleaner jokes. The one that actually won, which combined both absurdity and aggression, was “Shut up, Bob, everyone knows your parrot’s a clip-on.” Imagine trying to explain that to someone who is not a native English speaker, who doesn’t know your culture. They’d say: “But I am confused! You are wearing a parrot — this is part of a fashion?” No, you somehow accept that absurdity.

A lot of studies show that people who like that kind of humor tend to like more adventurous things in art, more modern music, and they tend to be more liberal in their politics. Just more adventurous in general. Probably if you look at people’s patterns, not only what they submit but also what they vote on, you start to see a profile of someone’s sense of humor.

I think the society socializes men to be more forthcoming with humor from the start. Women usually mean by “a good sense of humor” someone who makes them laugh, and men mean someone who laughs at their jokes.

There are a lot of winners from both New York and California. We’re very well represented on both coasts. But we’ve had winners from an awful lot of states. Still, bantering and joking around and seeing things in a funny way, maybe a cynical way, even a skeptical way, is second nature for New Yorkers.

It’s funny. Maybe I’m going somewhere in a cab or giving a speech, and somehow it’ll come up that I am the cartoon editor of The New Yorker. People will come up and show me their caption and say, “Honestly, was my caption not better than the ones that won?” Every once in a while, they’ll come up and ask me to explain a caption.

I think there’s something interesting about people not understanding cartoons. I go to universities, and there are incredibly smart people who are totally flummoxed by the caption contest. It’s not easy. There’s no way that the usual things you do yield a result. You have to sort of dream it.

Solving the caption contest shows you conceivably what the future is — creating world peace, or solving global warming. When you have an interconnected community all thinking about the same thing, you can get pretty good results.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/28/nyregion/thecity/28mank.html?_r=2&ref=thecity&oref=slogin&oref=slogin